Reglynn
Article 50 duties are enforceable now

Know where your AI product stands.In 10 minutes.

Your role, your risk tier, the obligations that actually apply and the correct post-Omnibus deadlines. Written for founders and product managers, not lawyers.

Most teams read "the EU delayed the AI Act" and concluded they had until 2027. Partly true - and the part that wasn't delayed is the part that applies to ordinary software companies. If you ship a chatbot or a generative feature, your duties are live today.

Start free

The risk check is free, permanently - no account, no card. Two minutes for your likely tier.

Run the free check →

What you can buy

Full Gap Report

€59

The version an investor or enterprise legal team will accept - dated, reasoned, with your product named in it.

  • Provider vs deployer role analysis - the question most teams get wrong
  • GPAI / Article 53 check
  • Risk tier, including the Article 6(3) exemption test
  • Every obligation with its correct post-Omnibus deadline
  • Prioritised remediation checklist - what to fix first
  • GDPR overlap notes, trust badge, Notion tracker
  • 12-month re-issue if the rules materially change

Report + Document Pack

€139

Everything above, plus three draft compliance documents pre-filled from your own answers: risk management plan, transparency notice, human oversight procedure. Drafts requiring legal review - marked as such.

Three systems

€149

€50 per system. A chatbot and a scoring model are not the same regulatory object - each needs its own assessment. Report-only; no Document Pack.

Agency - ten systems

€399

€40 per system, for agencies, fractional DPOs and portfolio operators. Report-only; no Document Pack.

Choose your version → See a real report first

Pay once. No subscription, no sales call. 14-day refund - if the report doesn't tell you something useful about your position, reply to the delivery email.

See it before you buy

A complete, unredacted gap report for an AI recruitment startup is public: reglynn.eu/sample-report. So is our classification methodology - a compliance tool that won't show its reasoning is asking you to take exactly the kind of undocumented position it warns you about.

How this was made. Reglynn reports are generated by an AI system - Reglynn's own question set and risk logic, running on Anthropic's Claude - and reviewed before delivery. Reglynn is itself a Limited Risk AI system under Article 50 of the EU AI Act, and we disclose AI involvement everywhere it occurs. Our own self-assessment is public: reglynn.eu/our-ai-act-status

Self-assessment, not legal advice. Reglynn is not a notified body and issues no certification. Your report indicates where you likely stand and what to verify with a qualified advisor.

The regulation keeps moving

It changed once already this year. Get an email when something changes that affects how AI systems are classified - not a newsletter, just the changes.

reglynn.eu · Guides · Deadlines · Affiliates - 40% · Privacy · Terms